From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S932693AbYCFMRu@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932693AbYCFMRu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:17:50 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765042AbYCFMRi
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:17:38 -0500
Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:42451 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1764412AbYCFMRg (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:17:36 -0500
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:17:14 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, andi@firstfloor.org, hch@infradead.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct - v4
Message-ID: <20080306121714.GB19613@elte.hu>
References: <20080304234003.603501000@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080304234003.603501000@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.1
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.1 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3
	-1.1 BAYES_05               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5%
	[score: 0.0110]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:

> Split the FPU save area from the task struct. This allows easy 
> migration of FPU context, and it's generally cleaner. It also allows 
> the following two optimizations:

thanks Suresh, applied.

	Ingo