mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Romano Giannetti <romanol@upcomillas.es>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	rjw@sisk.pl, len.brown@intel.com, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: fix aperture vs. suspend problem
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:30:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080314193049.GA24646@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1205482463.4561.3.camel@localhost>

On Fri 2008-03-14 09:14:23, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 23:38 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu 2008-03-13 15:32:48, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > [...] 
> > > This is also needed in 2.6.24, perhaps earlier?
> > 
> > It seems to only trigger on >3GB boxes, during swsusp. People are not
> > normally suspending those big boxes. I do not think this is worth
> > backporting.
> 
> Here vendors are starting to sell x86_64 laptops with 4GB ram in the
> *default* configuration --- so I think that yes, it should be
> backported, at least to 2.6.24 (which will be heavily shipped by distros
> this year, I suppose).

Ok, if you hit the problem, you can do the backport. Subject is wrong,
it hits hibernation, not suspend (sorry), and I'm not yet sure if I
fixed all the related problems. Testing welcome.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
pomozte zachranit klanovicky les:  http://www.ujezdskystrom.info/

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-14 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-13 10:05 Pavel Machek
2008-03-13 20:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-13 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 22:38   ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-14  8:14     ` Romano Giannetti
2008-03-14 19:30       ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-03-21 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080314193049.GA24646@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=romanol@upcomillas.es \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®