From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754052AbYCRJsA (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:48:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753178AbYCRJrv (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:47:51 -0400 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:45234 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752406AbYCRJru (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:47:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:46:58 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1][regression?] BUG: spinlock wrong CPU, modprobe Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, LKML In-Reply-To: <20080318001720.9b6aea83.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080317120848.7B3F.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080318001720.9b6aea83.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-Id: <20080318182845.0E0D.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.42 [ja] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew > > Call Trace: > > [] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > > sp=e00001609262fbd0 bsp=e000016092620fd8 > > [] dump_stack+0x30/0x60 > > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620fc0 > > [] spin_bug+0x1a0/0x1c0 > > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620f90 > > [] _raw_spin_unlock+0xd0/0x120 > > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620f60 > > [] _spin_unlock+0x20/0x40 > > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620f40 > > [] do_wp_page+0x500/0xfe0 > > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620ed8 > > [] handle_mm_fault+0xe80/0x10e0 > > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620e50 > > [] ia64_do_page_fault+0x600/0xa40 > > sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620df0 > > [] ia64_leave_kernel+0x0/0x270 > > sp=e00001609262fe30 bsp=e000016092620df0 > > > > I'm unaware of any other reports of anything like this so yes, please do > bisect it if you have the time. sorry, my report was uncleared. I already did bisect and found the bug in git-ia64.patch. and already reported Tony Luck. that mail is quote following. > Hi > > if revert following patch > > [IA64] Multiple outstanding ptc.g instruction support > > then this problem doesn't reproduce. > > I attached that revert patch. > Thanks! Thanks.