From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758934AbYCSTri (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:47:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755619AbYCSTcX (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:32:23 -0400 Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.2.20]:51274 "EHLO hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755561AbYCSTcI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:32:08 -0400 From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: 2.6.24.X: SATA/AHCI related boot delay. - not with 2.6.24.3 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:08:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org References: <200803091922.33083.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <200803190853.10030.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <47E0D5C8.9070005@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47E0D5C8.9070005@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803191108.18577.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mittwoch, 19. März 2008, Tejun Heo wrote: > x UDMA/133 abar m8192@0xf9dfc000 port 0xf9dfc200 > > > irq 315 > > [   38.125479] ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m8192@0xf9dfc000 port > > 0xf9dfc280 irq 315 > > [   38.597035] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) > > [   38.597732] ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD1600JS-00MHB1, 10.02E01, max > > UDMA/133 [   38.597775] ata1.00: 312581808 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 > > [   38.598405] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 > > [   39.069342] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) > > [   39.084225] ata2.00: ATA-8: SAMSUNG HD501LJ, CR100-12, max UDMA7 > > [   39.084264] ata2.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth > > 0/32) [   39.086268] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133 > > So, just to confirm.  With the updated patch, you don't see any problem, > right? Correct. With the updated patch I don't see problems in 'non-raid' mode. AHCI mode still has problems without nosmi. But that is an entirely different problem, right? Glück Auf, Volker