mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@gmail.com>
Cc: prasanna@in.ibm.com, ananth@in.ibm.com,
	anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Subject: kprobes-x86: correct post-eip value in post_hander()
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:08:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080321110804.GY20420@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Jao7N-0005OC-Fe@io.site5.com>


* Yakov Lerner <iler.ml@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was trying to get the address of instruction to be executed next 
> after the kprobed instruction.  But regs->eip in post_handler() 
> contains value which is useless to the user. It's pre-corrected value. 
> This value is difficult to use without access to resume_execution(), 
> which is not exported anyway. I moved the invocation of post_handler() 
> to *after* resume_execution(). Now regs->eip contains meaningful value 
> in post_handler().
> 
> I do not think this change breaks any backward-compatibility. To make 
> meaning of the old value, post_handler() would need access to 
> resume_execution() which is not exported.  I have difficulty to 
> believe that previous, uncorrected, regs->eip can be meaningfully used 
> in post_handler().

thanks, i've added your patch to the .26 bucket of x86.git, but it would 
be nice to get an Ack/Nack from a kprobes person as well.

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-21 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-16  8:21 Yakov Lerner
2008-03-17  5:19 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-17 10:59   ` Yakov Lerner
2008-03-17 12:39     ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-17 22:17       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-03-18  4:26         ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-21 11:08 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-03-21 11:31   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-21 14:32     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 14:51       ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-03-21 23:18   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080321110804.GY20420@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=iler.ml@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®