From: Chr <chunkeey@web.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: petero2@telia.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: PKTCDVD: possible recursive locking detected with 2.6.24.4/3
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:19:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803242119.30840.chunkeey@web.de> (raw)
Hi,
Whenever I start /etc/init.d/udftools. I get a warning from lockdep about
a possible recursive lockup... It looks like this:
---
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -80671344 ns)
pktcdvd: writer pktcdvd0 mapped to sr0
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.24.4 #1
---------------------------------------------
scsi_id/4705 is trying to acquire lock:
(&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a71a8>] do_open+0x74/0x2a9
but task is already holding lock:
(&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a71a8>] do_open+0x74/0x2a9
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by scsi_id/4705:
#0: (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff802a71a8>] do_open+0x74/0x2a9
#1: (&ctl_mutex#2){--..}, at: [<ffffffff881ecf2a>] pkt_open+0x27/0xda1
[pktcdvd]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 4705, comm: scsi_id Not tainted 2.6.24.4 #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80253b08>] __lock_acquire+0x1db/0xd3f
[<ffffffff802a71a8>] do_open+0x74/0x2a9
[<ffffffff802546f0>] lock_acquire+0x84/0xa8
[<ffffffff802a71a8>] do_open+0x74/0x2a9
[...]
(full dmesg + backtrace: http://www.pastebin.ca/955702 )
---
Well, as you can see the function that tries to get the lock... has it
already?! This sounds a bit bogus, what's going on here? Is this really
a locking bug or just lockdep noise?
(BTW: the pktcdvd device seems to work nonetheless...)
Regards,
Christian
reply other threads:[~2008-03-24 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200803242119.30840.chunkeey@web.de \
--to=chunkeey@web.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=petero2@telia.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®