From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Kconfig RTC selection (was: 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh.)
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:04:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803281304.39022.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47ECF70A.2060600@rtr.ca>
[ CC's trimmed a bit ]
On Friday 28 March 2008, Mark Lord wrote:
> > +# These legacy RTC drivers just cause too many conflicts with the generic
> > +# RTC framework ... let's not even try to coexist any more.
> ...
>
> Thanks, David. Could you perhaps also update the option descriptions
> to clearly indicate which set of RTCs are the new ones, and which are
> the old ones that are going away someday?
Hmm, I thought that would be clear from context.
"These" (drivers/char) legacy RTC drivers (old),
vs generic RTC framework (toplevel driver Kconfig).
Admittedly the *previous* Kconfig was troublesome,
at the UI level (vs. those comments outside the GUI).
A more general issue seems to be what to do with
those legacy RTC drivers. Few of them seem to
have maintainers. I don't want to own them, and
I doubt Alessandro does either. If their Kconfig
is going to change, I'd rather just see them all
flagged as deprecated ... with plans to delete them.
The RTCs in question being:
"RTC" ... replaced by new "rtc-cmos"
--> ready to deprecate now ?
"JS_RTC" ... a SPARC32 thing
--> bug?? no "js-rtc.c" in the tree! patch sent
"SGI_DS1286" ...
--> needs conversion to new framework
"SGI_IP27_RTC" ...
--> needs conversion to new framework
"GEN_RTC", "GEN_RTC_X" ... I never really saw the point
--> who uses this?
"EFI_RTC" ... IA64 only
--> needs conversion to new framework
"DS1302" ... M32R-specific, "rtc-ds1302" should replace it
--> ready to deprecate now?
Plus there are various chunks of RTC code elsewhere in the tree,
mostly in arch subdirectories, which should be phased out but
aren't such obvious targets.
> I didn't find it at all obvious, and I still don't know which set my
> configured kernel is actually using.
If you enable the new framework, that's what it's
using; there should be no other options visible.
(At least, none that are even as loosely organized
as the drivers/char stuff.)
Else ... it's clearly not enabled! So it's some
other (legacy) RTC driver. I don't see the issue.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-28 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-27 15:29 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh Mark Lord
2008-03-27 16:07 ` Greg KH
2008-03-28 0:32 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-03-28 1:57 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 3:12 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 4:42 ` Bob Tracy
2008-03-28 4:56 ` David Miller
2008-03-28 5:17 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 6:01 ` david
2008-03-28 16:34 ` Bob Tracy
2008-04-05 18:23 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-03-28 5:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-28 5:46 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 5:52 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 6:05 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 6:58 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 9:49 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 11:01 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-28 15:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-28 20:14 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 12:51 ` Kconfig RTC selection (was: 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh.) Tilman Schmidt
2008-03-28 13:49 ` Kconfig RTC selection Mark Lord
2008-03-28 19:22 ` Kconfig RTC selection (was: 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh.) David Brownell
2008-03-29 12:55 ` Kconfig RTC selection Tilman Schmidt
2008-03-28 13:47 ` 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh Mark Lord
2008-03-28 20:04 ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-03-28 21:06 ` Kconfig RTC selection (was: 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh.) Adrian Bunk
2008-03-28 21:23 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 21:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-28 21:45 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 21:59 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-28 22:18 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 22:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-29 11:40 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
2008-03-28 14:56 ` 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-28 17:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-29 3:58 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 1:51 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 2:11 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 2:13 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 14:34 ` Alan Stern
2008-03-28 14:57 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-27 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 5:22 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 2:14 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 9:24 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-30 21:04 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-30 21:09 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 11:55 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-03-31 14:39 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 15:04 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-03-31 15:04 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 15:14 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 16:37 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-03-31 17:03 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 17:06 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 17:15 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 17:21 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 17:30 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 18:05 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-03-31 19:21 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-02 8:04 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-04-02 14:38 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-02 14:38 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-02 15:05 ` 2.6.25-rc7/rc8 USB dead on resume Mark Lord
2008-04-02 15:21 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-04-02 15:08 ` 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh Alan Stern
2008-04-02 15:44 ` 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh. ---> PATCH Mark Lord
2008-04-02 15:47 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-02 15:49 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-02 20:09 ` Alan Stern
2008-04-02 16:04 ` 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh David Brownell
2008-04-02 16:09 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-02 20:22 ` David Brownell
2008-04-02 16:20 ` [PATCH] usb ehci_iaa_watchdog fix Mark Lord
2008-04-02 16:48 ` Alan Stern
2008-04-02 17:34 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-02 18:08 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-02 19:20 ` Alan Stern
2008-04-02 20:42 ` David Brownell
2008-04-02 21:08 ` Alan Stern
2008-04-07 23:37 ` David Brownell
2008-04-08 2:13 ` Alan Stern
2008-04-02 20:31 ` David Brownell
2008-04-02 20:55 ` Alan Stern
2008-04-02 23:07 ` David Brownell
2008-04-02 16:56 ` David Brownell
2008-04-01 9:59 ` 2.6.25-rc7: Ugh Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200803281304.39022.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome