mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:06:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080328170606.GF32200@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803281717.17962.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 05:17:17PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 28 of March 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:16:03PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:00:25PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:58 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > > > > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9969
> > > > > > > > Subject		: 2.6.24-git15 Keyboard Issue?
> > > > > > > > Submitter	: Chris Holvenstot <cholvenstot@comcast.net>
> > > > > > > > Date		: 2008-02-06 14:02 (51 days old)
> > > > > > > > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/6/100
> > > > > > > > 		  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/13/82
> > > > > > > > Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/343
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > asked the bug reporter for an update.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Now that lkml.org is working again, I checked the patch which is
> > > > > > referenced above and I have a hard time to connect it even remotely to
> > > > > > that bug.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > As far as I can tell the discussion on lkml identified GROUP_SCHED=y
> > > > > > as the culprit, but I have no idea whether there was any resolution
> > > > > > other than disabling GROUP_SCHED.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Peter ??
> > > > > 
> > > > > Correct, I am working on the issue but that's not going to be .25 stuff.
> > > > 
> > > > How are we going to get 2.6.25 working no worse than 2.6.24?
> > > > 
> > > > Letting GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN would sound logical, but that would 
> > > > also kill FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
> > > 
> > > I think default it to off should be sufficient.
> > 
> > A system administrator saying yes to GROUP_SCHED when running
> > "make oldconfig" can hardly be blamed for doing so, and "makes your 
> > mouse and keyboard unusable" mustn't be the result.
> > 
> > Avoiding unexpected breakages when toggling an option is _much_ more 
> > important than e.g. whether some exotic randconfig configuration 
> > compiles.
> 
> Perhaps add something like "(UNRELIABLE)" to the Kconfig option?

That would be called "depends on BROKEN".

There seem to be two choices:
- either FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y brought in some situations real advantages
  with 2.6.24, then the solution is to revert commits until 2.6.25 is no 
  worse than 2.6.24 (no matter how many and how big they are) or
- we can simply let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN in 2.6.25.

What we need are not hints for users how to avoid known problems, 
what we need are big cluebats for kernel developers who caused
regressions.

> Rafael

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-28 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-27 22:53 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28  0:18 ` Carlos R. Mafra
2008-03-28  0:23   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28  2:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-28  3:24   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-28  4:00     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-28 10:48       ` Paweł Staszewski
2008-03-28 17:46         ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-28 21:57           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 17:15       ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-28 17:27         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-28 18:08           ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-28 18:20             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-28 18:38               ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-28 18:47               ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-28 18:53                 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-28 19:37                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-28 19:59                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-28 19:59               ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-28 20:24                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-28 18:37           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-28 19:32             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-28 18:33       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-28 19:25         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-29 20:42           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-29 21:29             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-29 23:52               ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-31 18:56                 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-31 18:45               ` Christoph Lameter
2008-03-28  3:31   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 10:14     ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-03-31 12:10       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 11:29   ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-03-28 16:11     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 16:10   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 16:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-28 17:36       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-28 20:33         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 22:28       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-31 13:34         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 10:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-28 10:58   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-28 11:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-28 11:13       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-28 11:16         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-28 11:31           ` Adrian Bunk
2008-03-28 16:17             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 17:06               ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-03-28 20:42               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-28 22:33                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 11:44         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-28 16:12   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 16:18     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-28 18:57 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-28 22:37   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080328170606.GF32200@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=protasnb@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®