From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760573AbYDAPWE (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:22:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759392AbYDAPSN (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:18:13 -0400 Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:11805 "EHLO g4t0017.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752891AbYDAPSA (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:18:00 -0400 Message-Id: <20080401151737.850030639@ldl.fc.hp.com> References: <20080401151634.730901933@ldl.fc.hp.com> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:16:45 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Len Brown Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Adam Belay Cc: Li Shaohua Cc: Matthieu Castet Cc: Thomas Renninger Cc: Rene Herman Cc: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: Andrew Morton Subject: [patch 11/37] PNPACPI: pnpacpi_encode_ext_irq() wrongly set "irq" instead of "extended_irq" Content-Disposition: inline; filename=pnpacpi-fix-encode-extended-irq Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This has been wrong since at least 2.6.12. I haven't seen any bug reports, but it's clearly incorrect. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas Index: work7/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c =================================================================== --- work7.orig/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c 2008-03-20 11:50:19.000000000 -0600 +++ work7/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c 2008-03-20 12:02:18.000000000 -0600 @@ -818,9 +818,9 @@ resource->data.extended_irq.triggering = triggering; resource->data.extended_irq.polarity = polarity; if (triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE) - resource->data.irq.sharable = ACPI_EXCLUSIVE; + resource->data.extended_irq.sharable = ACPI_EXCLUSIVE; else - resource->data.irq.sharable = ACPI_SHARED; + resource->data.extended_irq.sharable = ACPI_SHARED; resource->data.extended_irq.interrupt_count = 1; resource->data.extended_irq.interrupts[0] = p->start; } --