From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933484AbYDBUpt (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:45:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763647AbYDBUmh (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:42:37 -0400 Received: from smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.92]:34296 "HELO smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1759763AbYDBUmf (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:42:35 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=kwbHKlKeY53YjJ6p1MLu72mMqumCOMSmtJ3uR6FJ7OEiAMrWPhubNc94opexVtKmv1GPoFJxvSTLqA1lGnzwwyoDwjD5OgN64x4lDyIYrfXcIJohZx35vb/Fmq2I92nQ8pXRBGgBQgFFmy7+vNBh6PdD5PE+4GVVvRVr3hPaZ+w= ; X-YMail-OSG: 4cBLG54VM1lryEFxqfBSUEMvKRXE_ptNQIqpx1IWzgQM.66_8c54e.s1hgoIkZYOdUPnqYON8g-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: Alan Stern Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb ehci_iaa_watchdog fix Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:42:32 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Mark Lord , pavel@suse.cz, oliver@neukum.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jikos@suse.cz, gregkh@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804021342.33102.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 02 April 2008, Alan Stern wrote: > > Which one should Andrew/Linus take? > > It's up to David, of course.  My preference is for the patch I > proposed, naturally enough. Mine was for the one that got two "it works" confirmations. :) > It fixes the cause rather than the symptom. I'm not sure I'd agree with that.