From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761998AbYDCIdd (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:33:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757142AbYDCIdZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:33:25 -0400 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:51901 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755275AbYDCIdY (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:33:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:33:12 +0900 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [rfc] SLQB: YASA Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Pekka Enberg , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Christoph Lameter In-Reply-To: <20080403082650.GA20132@wotan.suse.de> References: <20080403171626.0283.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080403082650.GA20132@wotan.suse.de> Message-Id: <20080403173110.0286.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.42 [ja] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi > > Do you have performance mesurement result? > > I hope see it if possible. > > > > Thanks! :) > > Nothing really interesting, unfortunately. I have run some tests on > various microbenchmarks like tbench and things like that. But I > don't have many good ideas for more meaningful tests where slab > allocation performance is critial. Any suggestions? :) nothing. sorry, i am not slab expert ;)