From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752472AbYDDEbO (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:31:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751338AbYDDEbA (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:31:00 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:48863 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751337AbYDDEa7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:30:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:30:10 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Pete Zaitcev , schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, Kiyoshi Ueda , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, Greg KH Subject: Re: kernel BUG at drivers/block/ub.c:820! Message-Id: <20080403213010.94045431.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <47F515A6.4040505@panasas.com> References: <1207212156.5602.5.camel@localhost> <20080403.110825.07645490.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> <1207235911.9155.16.camel@localhost> <20080403093042.f20e38a2.zaitcev@redhat.com> <47F515A6.4040505@panasas.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:36:38 +0300 Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03 2008 at 19:30 +0300, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:18:31 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > >> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 11:08 -0500, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote: > > > >>> I believe the patch from Pete fixes this BUG(): > >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=120613888005382&w=2 > >>> > >>> Could you try that? > >> Just tested the patch and it indeed fixes the bug. > > > > I'm glad. > > > >> Could we push this upstream for 2.6.25? It is a regression, I would > >> prefer to have a 2.6.25 that doesn't panic my machine when I attach a > >> USB stick.. > > > > I was going to work through Greg as usual and then push it to > > the stable tree. I'm not Linus' "leutenant", so I cannot just send > > him random patches. > > > > -- Pete > > This is a block device siting in block/ folder. It is certainly Jens's > linux-block territory. Best put it through the tree that introduced the > bug, no? > > Best would be to resend to Jens ASAP, it is a 2.6.25 regression. I stole it out of Greg's tree - I'll merge it Saturdayish unless someone stops me.