From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24 still doesn't boot on i486..
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:06:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080404130649.GG24239@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18422.8628.510177.819697@harpo.it.uu.se>
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 02:40:20PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Michael Tokarev writes:
> > Just a follow-up on my earlier bugreport, when
> > 2.6.23 first come out....
> >
> > 2.6.24 seems to not boot on i486-class hardware.
> > The machine reboots right after "Booting linux"
> > message. 2.6.22 was the last worked kernel.
> >
> > The relevant config entries are:
> >
> > CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y
> > CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
> > CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y
> > CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BUILD=y
> > CONFIG_X86_PC=y
> > CONFIG_M486=y
> > CONFIG_X86_GENERIC=y
> > CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y <-- is it right?
>
> yes
>
> > CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=7
> > CONFIG_X86_XADD=y
> > CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE=y
> > CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG=y
> > CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y
> > CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y
> > CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y
> > CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y
> > CONFIG_X86_ALIGNMENT_16=y
> > CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY=y
> > CONFIG_X86_MINIMUM_CPU_FAMILY=4
> > CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC=y
> > CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC=y
> > CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y
> > CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y
> > CONFIG_X86_MCE=y
> > CONFIG_X86_MCE_NONFATAL=y
> > CONFIG_X86_MCE_P4THERMAL=y
> > CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM=y
> > CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G=y
> >
> > Compiled with gcc (GCC) 4.2.3 (Debian 4.2.3-2).
> >
> > This email is also a JFYI-style email. Yesterday
> > I tried to debug this issue but discovered that the
> > power unit of that machine failed. Well, it still
> > works and the machine boots, but at the same time
> > it smells like frosted/fried plastic ;) So I don't
> > have i486 hardware anymore to test things on...
> >
> > And now I wonder if I'm the only person in this world
> > with i486 machine... ;)
>
> Just FYI, 2.6.23, 2.6.24 and 2.6.25-rc6 work fine on my i486DX4.
A DX4 has many features a DX2 does not. I will try upgrading from
2.6.18 to 2.6.24 on my DX2/66. It doesn't have any of the CPUID and
other clever enhancements that newer chips have.
> However, it's clear from your .config fragment above that you've
> enabled features that cannot possibly exist on a 486 (APICs and
> MCE for starters) and there may be bugs related to that. I suggest
> trimming your .config and making it 486-specific.
Doesn't APIC and MCE just do nothing if the system doesn't have them? I
thought normally it did.
--
Len Sorensen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-04 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 9:01 Michael Tokarev
2008-04-04 12:40 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-04-04 12:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-04 13:06 ` Lennart Sorensen [this message]
2008-04-04 13:01 ` Lennart Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080404130649.GG24239@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--to=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®