From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756193AbYDFVK2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:10:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753498AbYDFVKT (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:10:19 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:50582 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753535AbYDFVKS (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:10:18 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24 Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:10:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Natalie Protasevich References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804062310.20762.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, 5 of April 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10349 > > Subject : regression: am-utils stopped working in 2.6.25-rc* > > Submitter : Meelis Roos > > Date : 2008-03-28 15:20 (7 days old) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/28/174 > > This seems to be a bug in am-utils: > > https://bugzilla.am-utils.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612 > > and while we try very hard to not break existing binaries that assume some > old broken kernel behaviour, things like system setup code that is > outright buggy is kind of exempt from that rule. So I think in this case > it really is a user-level issue. OK, closed. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10346 > > Subject : Linux 2.6.25-rc6: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2510 > > Submitter : Georgi Chorbadzhiyski > > Date : 2008-03-27 17:29 (8 days old) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/27/246 > > I wouldn't call this a regression. It's a hard-to-trigger warning that is > being debugged. Dropped from the list. Thanks, Rafael