Re: Does Linux have plan to support memory hole remapping?

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 10:01:59AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > "Zhao Forrest" <forrest.zhao@gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > > As we can see from above information that the physical memory in system
> > > is 32768MB(32GB). However OS is only using about
> > > (32768-512)MB(MemTotal:     33010240 kB). Does this mean that this
> > > linux kernel can't use the physical memory remapped
> > > from (4G-512M, 4G) to (32G, 32G+512M)?
> > 
> > The linux kernel can only use the memory passed to it by the BIOS.
> > Sometimes they need special BIOS setup options to enable remapping. If
> > there are no such options and you can't upgrade it you're out of luck
> > 
> > I would suggest you contact your system vendor.
> 
> I second that.  On my home machine I have early ASUS AMD x64 board 
> from a few years ago.  For it I did buy CPU with this memory mapping 
> hardware inside, but the BIOS did not support it correctly until a 
> year or two latter, thus I was not able to use all of 4 GB of memory I 
> had installed there. There was support in BIOS from start, but it did 
> things wrong.

having said that - but we'll still consider sane looking patches that 
allow the remapping of otherwise inactive RAM. [ We might not even have 
to touch the system chipset beyond what Linux already knows about it: in 
theory someone might want to try a hack to GART remap such RAM areas and 
use a sparse mem map entry to map it to Linux - if the identity of that 
RAM is crystal-clear and there's enough GART space available. But even 
then it's probably still at best a dangerous and fragile hack. ]

	Ingo