mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: x86 git tree broken
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:51:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080410205106.GB15440@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804102159.14563.rjw@sisk.pl>


* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> Second, if I try to suspend the box to RAM, it enters a state it 
> cannot leave until power is physically cut from it (using the power 
> button to power off / power on the box doesn't help).

i used your config on an AMD system here and s2ram works just fine, both 
using CONFIG_PM_TEST_SUSPEND=y bootup suspend self-test [which x86.git 
QA uses all the time], and using a manual pm-suspend command at the 
console.

you can also try your luck and remove the last 20% of x86.git [which is 
always the newest stuff], by picking a commit 200 patches down the line, 
via:

 git-rev-list x86/base..x86/latest | head -200 | tail -1

and testing that. If that tree works, it's the last 200 commits that 
break stuff.

exactly what kind of system are you using? If you revert the trampoline 
changes, does it get any better - but i guess it might be better to do a 
bisection.

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-10 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-10 19:59 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-10 20:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 20:25   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-10 20:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 20:38       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-10 22:28         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 19:26           ` x86 git tree broken (bisected) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 20:23             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 20:29               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 20:26             ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-11 20:51               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 21:11                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-11 21:21                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11 21:31                     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13  8:24                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13  8:41                   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 16:14                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-14  9:02                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-13 16:12                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-13 18:07                     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 18:47                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-13 18:53                         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 18:54                         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 22:00                     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 22:10                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-13 22:32                         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 23:41                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-13 23:45                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-14  0:09                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-14  0:12                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-14  0:19                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-14  1:42                             ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-14  9:16                               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-14 18:08                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-14 20:21                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-14 21:06                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-14 21:09                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-14 21:36                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13  7:51               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-13  7:59                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13  7:58             ` [rfc] hw resource debugging checks (was: Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected)) Ingo Molnar
2008-04-13  8:18               ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13  9:19                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-13  9:39               ` [rfc] hw resource debugging checks Andi Kleen
2008-04-13 17:53                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-13 18:19                 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 18:29                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-13 19:29                     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-14  3:52                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-14  5:01                         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-14 14:12                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-14 18:11                             ` Yinghai Lu
2008-04-13 15:48               ` [rfc] hw resource debugging checks (was: Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected)) Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-10 20:51 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-04-10 22:27   ` x86 git tree broken Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-11  6:43     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080410205106.GB15440@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®