From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758666AbYDJW1f (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:27:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752497AbYDJW10 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:27:26 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:50551 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750982AbYDJW1Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:27:25 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: x86 git tree broken Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:27:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML , Pavel Machek , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Anvin" References: <200804102159.14563.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080410205106.GB15440@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080410205106.GB15440@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804110027.06078.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 10 of April 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Second, if I try to suspend the box to RAM, it enters a state it > > cannot leave until power is physically cut from it (using the power > > button to power off / power on the box doesn't help). > > i used your config on an AMD system here and s2ram works just fine, both > using CONFIG_PM_TEST_SUSPEND=y bootup suspend self-test [which x86.git > QA uses all the time], and using a manual pm-suspend command at the > console. > > you can also try your luck and remove the last 20% of x86.git [which is > always the newest stuff], by picking a commit 200 patches down the line, > via: > > git-rev-list x86/base..x86/latest | head -200 | tail -1 > > and testing that. If that tree works, it's the last 200 commits that > break stuff. Yes, I'll probably do that, but don't have that much time today. > exactly what kind of system are you using? It's an Athlon 64 X2 on an ULi-based AsRock motherboard with Radeon X300SE (PCIe). > If you revert the trampoline changes, does it get any better - but i guess > it might be better to do a bisection. I'll try to figure out what is the last good commit. Thanks, Rafael