From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761406AbYDKR4e (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:56:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760467AbYDKR40 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:56:26 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:11934 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760304AbYDKR4Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:56:25 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,642,1199692800"; d="scan'208";a="268552871" Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:56:24 -0700 From: Suresh Siddha To: Kamalesh Babulal Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Ingo Molnar , Andy Whitcroft , akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [BUG] linux-next: April 10 - kernel oops at kmem_cache_alloc () regression from April 9 kernel Message-ID: <20080411175623.GC6542@linux-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20080410181404.b76939a6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <47FE5765.2030401@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47FE5765.2030401@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:37:33PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > When booting the x86_64 boxes with the next-20080409 and 20080410 kernels > the kernel bug is hit. The same bug was reported for the April 9 kernel > at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/10/63 (this kernel was compiled with > CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is not set) > > > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000000 > IP: [] kmem_cache_alloc+0x41/0x130 > PGD 32dc2e067 PUD 32dd6a067 PMD 0 > Oops: 0000 [1] SMP > last sysfs file: /sys/kernel/uevent_seqnum > CPU 0 > Modules linked in: sg > Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.25-rc8-next-20080410-autotest #1 > RIP: 0010:[] [] kmem_cache_alloc+0x41/0x130 > RSP: 0000:ffff810bfe4abef8 EFLAGS: 00010046 > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff81090e4aa050 RCX: 0000000000405017 > RDX: 00007ffffb4c05b8 RSI: 00000000000000d0 RDI: 0000000000000000 > RBP: 0000000000000292 R08: 0000000000586f00 R09: 0000000000586f20 > R10: 0000000000586f08 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000000d0 > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000405150 R15: 0000000000000000 > FS: 000000000058b850(0063) GS:ffffffff8067f000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b > CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000090d0e6000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Process init (pid: 1, threadinfo ffff810bfe4aa000, task ffff81090e4aa050) > Stack: 0000000000000000 ffff81090e4aa050 ffff81090e4aa050 0000000000000001 > 0000000000405110 ffffffff80212f96 0000000000000292 ffff81090e4aa050 > 00007ffffb4c05a8 ffffffff8020cb79 0000000000000000 ffffffff804da339 > Call Trace: > [] init_fpu+0x96/0xf0 > [] math_state_restore+0x19/0x60 > [] error_exit+0x0/0x51 I noticed in another thread, that you are using gcc 4.1.1. I think both 4.1.0 and 4.1.1 has some issues with weak symbols. Can you please try gcc 4.1.2 and see if that fixes your issue. When I go back to 4.1.0, I am bitten by smilar oops. But not with 4.1.2. thanks, suresh