From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757024AbYDNHuD (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:50:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756303AbYDNHtw (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:49:52 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:42471 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755065AbYDNHtv (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:49:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:49:09 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, me@bobcopeland.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3 Message-Id: <20080414004909.1b21b738.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1208041121-26787-1-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> <20080412170304.54f139e2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413033344.GA27494@hash.localnet> <20080412205544.5e12a7d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413080130.GA9622@infradead.org> <20080413012001.8d7967f4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413082815.GA20108@infradead.org> <1208121358.2700.4.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:25:46 +0200 Miklos Szeredi wrote: > And I didn't advocate moving > ntfs to fuse, still that was done and the resulting filesystem at the > moment happens to outperform the kernel one in every respect ;) Gad. Why?