From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760927AbYDNOm7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:42:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756823AbYDNOmu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:42:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:50157 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756808AbYDNOmt (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:42:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:42:28 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Andrew Morton , nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, k-miyoshi@cb.jp.nec.com, greg@kroah.com, Bernhard Walle , kdb@oss.sgi.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Takenori Nagano , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , "Eric W. Biederman" , Keith Owens Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] add new notifier function ,take3 Message-ID: <20080414144228.GD1193@hmsendeavour.rdu.redhat.com> References: <47FF190B.6030406@ah.jp.nec.com> <20080411210751.e4a468b2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080414134622.GB6941@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080414134622.GB6941@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:46:22AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:07:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > [..] > > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Panic by panic_module. > > > __tunable_atomic_notifier_call_chain enter > > > msg_handler:panic_event was called. > > > ipmi_wdog:wdog_panic_handler was called. > > > notifier_test: notifier_test_panic() is called. > > > notifier_test: notifier_test_panic2() is called. > > > > OK. But I don't see anywhere in here the most important piece of > > information: why do we need this feature in Linux? > > > > What are the use-cases? What is the value? etc. > > > > Often I can guess (but I like the originator to remove the guesswork). In > > this case I'm stumped - I can't see any reason why anyone would want this. > > > > Hi Andrew, > > To begin with, he wants kdb, kgdb etc to co-exist with kdump. He wants > to put all the RAS tools (who are interested in panic event) on a list > and export it to user space and let user decide in what order do the tool get > executed at panic time (based on priority). > > This brings in little bit reliability concerns for kdump due to notifier > code being run after panic. > > I think people want to use this infrastrutucure beyond RAS tools. I > remember somebody wanting to send a message to remote node after a > panic (before kdump kicks in) so that remote node can initiate failover > etc. > I know it doesn't particularly relate to this patch, but FWIW, for cases like failover, I've inserted infrastrucutre in the userspace part of kdump for Fedora/RHEL to support this sort of thing. We can run arbitrary scripts righte before and after a capture so that notifications can be sent to remote nodes in a much safer fashion than using the notifier chain after a panic. Neil -- /*************************************************** *Neil Horman *Software Engineer *Red Hat, Inc. *nhorman@redhat.com *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1 *http://pgp.mit.edu ***************************************************/