From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758509AbYDNUXi (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:23:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751591AbYDNUXa (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:23:30 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.31]:4024 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751042AbYDNUX3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:23:29 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=qxqqODlddhg4XQyZFHT/dVJ6V5xlTXAhwZTqecjqWLK+Os3teo5cb3Ld7f/WESC+QIfZTH/yP6w/3eL2Q6tixay5Fhao5Os0WDITrjkKy68NdlzJENuTdCULqfkrfXSCU+fxmw56/LrzgVEpLzWuTAdZCTJXumt2ryMsHcBxasU= Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:23:14 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Carlos Corbacho Cc: Ivo van Doorn , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] rfkill: add read-write rfkill switch support Message-ID: <20080414162209.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> References: <1207946244-14525-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <20080414012038.GB14406@khazad-dum.debian.net> <200804141400.41319.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200804142006.51224.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200804142006.51224.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 08:06:50PM +0100, Carlos Corbacho wrote: > I agree wholeheartedly with Henrique here though - wireless drivers should > _not_ be using key press events as a reporting mechanism. > Reporting mechanism for what exacly though? Depending on what you are talking about we either agree or disagree here ;) -- Dmitry