mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]add private data to struct notifier_bock
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:05:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080414200501.GA29123@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208196249.7164.7.camel@twins>

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 08:04:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 09:19 -0700, mark gross wrote:
> > I am working with one of the iwl4965 developers to add pm_qos based
> > power management to its power states.  We relalized that the block
> > notifier I used in the PM_QOS has no way of passing in any driver device
> > instance data.  In this case the developer expected the notification
> > call backs to call the iwl4965 notification function with an instance
> > pointer to the correct *dev.
> > 
> > Poking around I've noticed a handful of drivers using notifications that
> > seem to keep a list of instance pointers around so it can plug into the
> > notification infrastructure.  including : ipmi_msghandler.c adb_hid.c
> > md.c ips.c
> > 
> > As having a registered call back called with a private data pointer set
> > up at registration time  is such a common idiom I thought it might be a
> > good thing to add a private_data pointer to the struct notifier_block
> > and add the interfaces needed to pass the private data as the
> > notification chain is processed.
> 
> How is:
> 
> struct my_device_thingy {
> 	...
> 	struct notifier_block my_notifier;
> 	...
> };
> 
> int my_device_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val
> 			    void *data)
> {
> 	struct my_device_thingy *mdt = container_of(nb, struct
> 				 my_device_thingy, my_notifier);
> 
> 	...
> }
> 
> not sufficient?

Because ... um....a.... that would work too.  

Please ignore my last patch.

Thanks!

--mgross


      reply	other threads:[~2008-04-14 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-14 16:19 mark gross
2008-04-14 18:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-14 20:05   ` mark gross [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080414200501.GA29123@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome