From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762792AbYDQBfY (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:35:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934017AbYDQB3n (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:29:43 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:52252 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934013AbYDQB3m (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:29:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080416.182938.23275180.davem@davemloft.net> To: ivdoorn@gmail.com Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, hmh@hmh.eng.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] rfkill support for r/w and r/o rfkill switches From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200804162240.38704.IvDoorn@gmail.com> References: <200804162126.43771.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20080416195822.GA25066@tuxdriver.com> <200804162240.38704.IvDoorn@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ivo van Doorn Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:40:38 +0200 > Dave, do you want the rfkill patches directly, or should they go through > the wireless tree first? I'm happy if it goes through the wireless tree. That way experts like John and the others can review it from a wireless perspective, and it's one less pull for me to do :-)