From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:25:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080417002552.5742ad65.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080416202338.GA6007@elte.hu>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:23:38 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26?
How much of this has not been in -mm?
How much of this has not been in linux-next?
> too many topics to list them all - there are 884 patches from 74 authors
> at the moment.
>
> a few highlights:
>
> - 4096 CPUs support. (Yes, such big boxes exist, and they run Linux.)
>
> - mmiotrace feature: trace accesses to hw components to help figure out
> how they are programmed.
>
> - kmemcheck feature: Valgrind for the native Linux kernel in essence -
> detects access to uninitialized memory.
>
> - ftrace plugin for sysprof
sysprof is crap.
> - fixed StackProtector security feature (these fixes were too intrusive
> for v2.6.25)
>
> - lazy FPU allocation/speedup - offloaded/large FPU/SSE state support
>
> - SMP-boot, mpparse, DMA ops unification
>
> - PAT support - first step towards phasing out MTRR's for cache
> attribute control
>
> - enable GBPAGES - faster TLB misses on CPUs that support it
>
> - debug helper: view kernel pagetable layout via debugfs
Needs documentation.
> x86: introduce /dev/mem restrictions with a config option
This should be runtime-settable, not build-time settable.
> ...
>
> Randy Dunlap (2):
> ...
> linux-next: Tree for April 10 (arch/x86)
borked patch title.
> Soren Sandmann (1):
> x86: add the debugfs interface for the sysprof tool
There were serious objections that this is weaker than and duplicative of
oprofile which were not adequately addressed.
Also, I (and apparently only I) actually reviewed the implementation and
found it to be riddled with bugs and shortcomings. afacit this was
completely ignored and you propose to merge it anwyay?
I obviously don't have time to go through it all, but I'm afraid I cannot
be very confident in it. All I can say is "the parts which have been in
-mm seem to compile and run". A quick grep indicates that only 644 of
these 884 patches are in -mm. And a lot of them only turned up a week or
two ago.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-17 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-16 20:23 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-16 20:37 ` Roland Dreier
2008-04-16 22:18 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-04-16 20:50 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-17 10:06 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-17 10:51 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-17 13:33 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-18 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 10:51 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-17 7:25 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-04-17 7:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-17 8:20 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 8:32 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-04-17 8:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-17 8:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 8:42 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-17 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 18:01 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 18:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 19:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 20:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 9:33 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2008-04-18 9:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 8:14 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 8:57 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-17 10:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-04-17 10:50 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-17 17:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 8:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 8:45 ` David Miller
2008-04-17 8:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 8:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 9:19 ` David Miller
2008-04-17 9:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 9:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 9:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 10:06 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 10:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-17 10:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 10:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-17 10:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-17 10:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 10:42 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18 11:12 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-17 14:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-17 15:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 10:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-17 18:47 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-17 19:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 19:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-17 19:39 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-17 19:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 20:39 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-17 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 9:53 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 7:48 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 6:27 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 6:38 ` David Miller
2008-04-18 7:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 8:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-18 8:18 ` David Miller
2008-04-18 12:48 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080417002552.5742ad65.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome