From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756214AbYDQT1y (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:27:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752550AbYDQT1o (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:27:44 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:34524 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752434AbYDQT1o (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:27:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:27:29 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Vegard Nossum Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26 Message-ID: <20080417192729.GA3058@elte.hu> References: <20080416202338.GA6007@elte.hu> <20080417002552.5742ad65.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080417083000.GA4935@elte.hu> <20080417014054.ea788f1f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080417090626.GA14383@elte.hu> <20080417021813.04df7912.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080417093025.GA17389@elte.hu> <20080417023603.672d1032.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <19f34abd0804171147l4403d49aoeab005105a90392b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0804171147l4403d49aoeab005105a90392b@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Vegard Nossum wrote: > > Does it really really really need to consume one of our few remaining page > > flags? We'll be in a mess when we run out. > > Actually it doesn't. I attach a patch which gets rid of the page flag, > and we rely instead on the PTE flag for page-trackedness. [...] > Ingo, will you take this for some additional testing? thanks Vegard, i've applied it - looks good to me too. Ingo