From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761293AbYDQS4P (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:56:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752838AbYDQS4A (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:56:00 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:38465 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752789AbYDQSz7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:55:59 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: david@lang.hm Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:56:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804172056.34841.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 17 of April 2008, david@lang.hm wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > It's been long promised, but there it is now. Special thanks to Ingo who > > found and fixed a nasty-looking regression that turned out to not be a > > regression at all, but an old bug that just had not been triggering as > > reliably before. > > > > That said, that was just the last particular regression fix I was holding > > things up for, and it's not like there weren't a lot of other fixes too, > > they just didn't end up being the final things that triggered my > > particular worries. > > Rafael, > could you post the list of the remaining known regressions in 2.6.25. a > few days ago there were about 2 dozen left, but there was a flurry of > activity (patching, identifying some as not regressions, others as being > fixed, etc) so I've lost track of what's left Yes, I will post that later today. Thanks, Rafael