From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
sam@ravnborg.org, arjan@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:58:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080418065806.35c73f96@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080418002858.de236663.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:28:58 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > No harm done on a
> > perfectly bug-free system - but once a bug happens that SELinux
> > should have mitigated, the breakage becomes real. Having a
> > prominent warning is the _minimum_.
> >
> > having a build failure would be nice too because this is a build
> > environment problem. (not a build warning - warnings can easily be
> > missed because on a typical kernel build there's so many false
> > positives that get emitted by various other warning mechanisms)
> > Arjan?
> >
>
> Yeah, #error would work too.
I'm totally fine with that, but I think I need Sam's help on making that happen
the right way; this is going to need makefile fu L(
Sam:
Basically what I need is that if the
scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh script fails, the build aborts with
a message/#error that says that the compiler is not capable of supporting this feature.
Right now the script is used like this:
stackp := $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh
stackp-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR) := $(shell $(stackp) \
"$(CC)" -fstack-protector )
It's obviously easy to make this script print a warning.. but how do we make it stop the build?
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-18 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-17 23:03 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:24 ` Greg KH
2008-04-18 0:48 ` Kay Sievers
2008-04-18 1:12 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 4:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:24 ` Dan Williams
2008-04-17 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 0:14 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 3:05 ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 11:46 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 12:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:41 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 13:02 ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 13:22 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 13:27 ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 14:47 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 16:02 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 21:54 ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-17 23:55 ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18 0:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 14:55 ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18 1:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 14:57 ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18 5:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-18 6:10 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 7:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 13:58 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2008-04-18 16:57 ` Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good) Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-18 6:40 ` 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18 6:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 7:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18 10:32 ` James Morris
2008-04-18 7:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 7:50 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 7:53 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 7:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 9:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 9:42 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18 15:22 ` Alan Stern
2008-04-18 11:07 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-28 16:42 ` 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface Mel Gorman
2008-04-28 16:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-29 9:39 ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-28 18:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-29 9:43 ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 15:49 ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 16:58 ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 21:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-30 11:16 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080418065806.35c73f96@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®