From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758409AbYDRHJv (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:09:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754190AbYDRHJl (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:09:41 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:45050 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753611AbYDRHJk (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:09:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:09:13 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Morton Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Pekka Enberg , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, James Morris , Stephen Smalley , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good Message-ID: <20080418070913.GA16599@elte.hu> References: <20080417160331.b4729f0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080417160331.b4729f0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andrew Morton wrote: > > I repulled all the trees an hour or two ago, installed everything on an > 8-way x86_64 box and: > > > stack-protector: > > Testing -fstack-protector-all feature > No -fstack-protector-stack-frame! > -fstack-protector-all test failed that's the stackprotector self-test: you probably have a gcc that cannot build a proper stackprotector kernel. No damage other than having no stackprotector. Arjan Cc:-ed. Ingo