From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757973AbYDRMtX (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:49:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757564AbYDRMs6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:48:58 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:56031 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757512AbYDRMs5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:48:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:48:34 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: David Miller Cc: hch@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@infradead.org Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26 Message-ID: <20080418124834.GB20857@elte.hu> References: <20080418074736.GA27579@elte.hu> <20080418010008.2fb29e5c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080418081113.GA789@infradead.org> <20080418.011858.228414800.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080418.011858.228414800.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * David Miller wrote: > > > include/asm/pgtable.h: In function `set_pte_at': > > > include/asm/pgtable.h:670: warning: `init_mm' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/sched.h:1616) > > > > Why is is deprecated anyway? I think we all agreed that killing the > > export is good, but I don't see any way how we could kill the core > > useage. > > set_pte_at() is done inside drivers and what-not, you're not going to > be able to get rid of this export so easily. ok, good point, i zapped this change [it was in the x86/testing section anyway, i.e. not to be pushed upstream as an x86 change] - and if it's resubmitted it should be sent to -mm anyway. Arjan, what do you think? Ingo