From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759703AbYDRVcE (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:32:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751052AbYDRVby (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:31:54 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:57065 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750977AbYDRVby (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:31:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:31:10 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: x86: spinlock ops are always-inlined Message-Id: <20080418143110.c8e596c8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <200804181847.m3IIlLPr032254@hera.kernel.org> References: <200804181847.m3IIlLPr032254@hera.kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:47:21 GMT Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7fda20f146d5d217684ffbc37c6b6c5f82c2dffd > Commit: 7fda20f146d5d217684ffbc37c6b6c5f82c2dffd > Parent: d93c870bad38e8daaaf9f7e900a13431f24becbb > Author: Ingo Molnar > AuthorDate: Fri Feb 29 10:29:38 2008 +0100 > Committer: Ingo Molnar > CommitDate: Thu Apr 17 17:41:29 2008 +0200 > > x86: spinlock ops are always-inlined > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar > --- > include/asm-x86/spinlock.h | 12 ++++++------ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h b/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h > index 47dfe26..bc6376f 100644 > --- a/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h > +++ b/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static inline int __raw_spin_is_contended(raw_spinlock_t *lock) > return (((tmp >> 8) & 0xff) - (tmp & 0xff)) > 1; > } > > -static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) > +static __always_inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) What was the reason for making this change?