From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754837AbYDRXyT (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:54:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752632AbYDRXyJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:54:09 -0400 Received: from alephnull.demon.nl ([83.160.184.112]:43854 "EHLO xi.wantstofly.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752602AbYDRXyI (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:54:08 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1480 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:54:07 EDT DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=1148133259; d=wantstofly.org; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type: content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=dajH8B2NsQy/1cl5s6x8AsslEQ334XBzzl6cj/RjNS7ng6PZNdIEd+FKSce8+ HKpz6H8z+ICv/9uzRGQDh/WzQ== Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:29:22 +0200 From: Lennert Buytenhek To: Jeff Garzik Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, kernel@wantstofly.org, Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] ARM minor irq handler cleanups Message-ID: <20080418232922.GA31711@xi.wantstofly.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 07:22:45PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Avoid confusion by /not/ passing an unused pointer to > arm_rtc_interrupt() Looks OK to me. > This change's main purpose is to prepare for the patchset in > jgarzik/misc-2.6.git#irq-remove, that explores removal of the > never-used 'irq' argument in each interrupt handler. What do you mean? I know at least one of two interrupt handlers in-tree that use their 'irq' arguments.