From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764886AbYDVTNV (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:13:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762625AbYDVTM6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:12:58 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:53446 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761712AbYDVTM5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:12:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:12:13 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , npiggin@suse.de, peterz@infradead.org, sam@ravnborg.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/11] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI function calls Message-ID: <20080422191213.GA6370@elte.hu> References: <1208890227-24808-1-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com> <1208890227-24808-3-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Torvalds wrote: > > [ Ingo added to cc, since this is x86-specific ] > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic_32.c > > @@ -1357,6 +1357,10 @@ void __init smp_intr_init(void) > > > > /* IPI for generic function call */ > > set_intr_gate(CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR, call_function_interrupt); > > + > > + /* IPI for single call function */ > > + set_intr_gate(CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR, > > + call_function_single_interrupt); > > Ok, one more comment.. > > Why bother with separate vectors for this? this was my first question a month ago when Jens/Nick first submitted it :) > Or is it just a performance optimization? [...] yes and i gave in - Nick and Jens wants to do some crazy stuff and they had the numbers. Here's the previous discussion: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/27/125 Ingo