From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Richard Jonsson <richie@coderworld.net>
Subject: Re: [git pull] scheduler changes for v2.6.26
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:46:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080423094644.GB23293@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804231136.50639.elendil@planet.nl>
* Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:
> If I enable tracing with these settings, I get data in both trace
> *and* in latency_trace. Is the last correct? From
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/10/43 I got the impression that file
> should only be used if the "wakeup" tracer is active.
yeah, that's the intended behavior. 'trace' and 'latency_trace' are two
kinds of 'views' on the same set of tracer data (with a different output
format). They are both non-destructive - i.e. they dont deplete the
trace buffers.
there's even a third view: 'trace_pipe' - which depletes the trace
buffers and can be used to pipe trace data into a larger file:
cat trace_pipe > /tmp/large-trace.txt
i guess it would be less confusing if 'trace' and 'latency_trace' was
just a single 'view' and its behavior depended on iter_ctl settings. (In
fact, we could probably just get rid of latency_trace - it is a leftover
from -rt.)
> From the last run I've got three traces with 50000 entries (about a
> minute worth each). Traces 1 and 2 should each have two skips and
> trace 3 should have four. I've saved both the trace and latency_trace
> (ltrace) files.
>
> They are available at:
> http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/kernel/sched/.
thanks, we'll have a look.
> BTW, did either of you actually look at the traces I sent for .24? I
> never got any feedback on those.
hm, i looked at them - i thought i mailed you about that but indeed i
didnt (sorry about that) - the traces were too short in scope - they
just covered a few dozen milliseconds in scope, while your description
said that the problem occured seconds into the trace.
> P.S. I've got group scheduling active in this config as my tests with
> .24 showed that did not make any difference. Can rerun without if
> needed.
no need to rerun - but if you do the next test it might make sense to
disable it, just to reduce the number of variables.
another thing - Peter observed skipping on NOHZ. Does your skipping go
away if you boot with 'nohz' and/or with CONFIG_NOHZ=y disabled in the
.config?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-23 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-19 18:13 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-19 18:47 ` Guillaume Chazarain
2008-04-19 18:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-19 18:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-19 19:47 ` Frans Pop
2008-04-21 12:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-21 16:31 ` Frans Pop
2008-04-21 19:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-22 8:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-22 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-22 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-22 12:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-23 8:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-23 10:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-23 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-23 13:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-04-22 9:41 ` Kevin Winchester
2008-04-22 10:49 ` David Miller
2008-04-22 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-23 9:36 ` Frans Pop
2008-04-23 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-23 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-04-23 13:36 ` Frans Pop
2008-04-29 12:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-29 15:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-04-23 16:23 ` Frans Pop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080423094644.GB23293@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richie@coderworld.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®