mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Matthew <jackdachef@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rudolf Marek" <r.marek@assembler.cz>,
	"Gene Heskett" <gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:36:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804232336.41603.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e85b9d30804200502p25842ec2i712da9e388c08e87@mail.gmail.com>

On Sunday 20 April 2008, Matthew wrote:
> >  sure, I'll test-drive the vanilla-kernel, too
> >
> >  thanks
> 
> ok, tested the vanilla-kernel this morning and it shows the exact high
> temperatures (with CONFIG_THERMAL=y)
> 
> I've got a question:
> 
> when trying to disable thermal it just sits there & won't change:
> <*> Hardware Monitoring support  --->
>   -*- Generic Thermal sysfs driver  --->
> 
> it seemingly depends on other things:
> Selected by: ACPI_THERMAL && !X86_VOYAGER && ACPI && ACPI_PROCESSOR
> 
> is it safe to disable acpi_processor and acpi or CONFIG_THERMAL in
> general ? or will it burn down my box ? ;)
> 
> I'm asking this because it says/writes:
> CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL:                                                    │
>   │                                                                         │
>   │ This driver adds support for ACPI thermal zones.  Most mobile and       │
>   │ some desktop systems support ACPI thermal zones.  It is HIGHLY          │
>   │ recommended that this option be enabled, as your processor(s)           │
>   │ may be damaged without it.

Don't worry about it -- that is sort of an exageration.
In fact, it is your disk drive that will fry first:-)

# CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL is not set
# CONFIG_THERMAL is not set

Should be just fine, particularly for experimentation.
In the case of a desktop system, ACPI_THERMAL is generally there
just for processor throttling -- which would typically
only be needed if you removed your heatsink
or had some other serious cooling issue.
And even if it is not there, a 2nd defense,
the processor hardware thermal throttling would kick
in automatically at a slightly higher temperature...

-Len

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-24  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-18 15:37 Matthew
2008-04-18 15:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-18 16:02   ` Matthew
2008-04-18 19:38   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-04-18 20:03     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-04-19  3:05       ` Rene Herman
2008-04-19  3:20         ` Rene Herman
2008-04-19  6:17           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-04-19 10:18             ` Matthew
2008-04-19 10:22               ` Matthew
2008-04-20 12:02                 ` Matthew
2008-04-24  3:36                   ` Len Brown [this message]
2008-04-18 16:24 ` Gene Heskett
2008-04-18 16:27 ` Gene Heskett
2008-04-18 19:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2008-04-18 20:24   ` Jiri Slaby
2008-04-18 20:50     ` Rudolf Marek
2008-04-19  1:51 ` Linux 2.6.25 (coretemp reads high temperatures) Len Brown
2008-04-21 16:10   ` Thomas Bächler
2008-04-21 16:28     ` Matthew
2008-04-21 17:07       ` Fwd: " Matthew
2008-04-22  9:26         ` Matthew
2008-04-23  8:43   ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-04-28 18:19     ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-04-29 13:07       ` Thomas Renninger
2008-04-29 15:08         ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-29 22:14           ` Rudolf Marek
2008-04-29 22:58             ` Matthew
2008-04-30  6:10               ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-30 14:46                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-04-30 14:50                   ` Rudolf Marek
2008-04-30 15:18                     ` Jean Delvare
2008-05-02 20:35                   ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-30  0:11             ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-04-30  6:20               ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-30 14:51                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-04-30 15:28                   ` Jean Delvare
2008-05-02 20:36                   ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-04 17:42                     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-05-05 13:45                       ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-02 20:35             ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-17  3:32 Linux 2.6.25 Linus Torvalds
2008-04-17  4:22 ` david
2008-04-17 18:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200804232336.41603.lenb@kernel.org \
    --to=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
    --cc=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
    --cc=jackdachef@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=r.marek@assembler.cz \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome