From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763475AbYDYUHu (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:07:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759865AbYDYUHl (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:07:41 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56146 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759703AbYDYUHk (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:07:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080425.130739.121044720.davem@davemloft.net> To: mingo@elte.hu Cc: peterz@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [git pull] scheduler/misc fixes From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20080425105149.GA11227@elte.hu> References: <1209109710.7115.400.camel@twins> <1209118778.7115.417.camel@twins> <20080425105149.GA11227@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ingo Molnar Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:51:49 +0200 > I.e. i'd pretty much concur with you that the best solution is the very > first patch - which is also in the pull to Linus - we just now > understand exactly why ;-) David, do you agree? I just want my machines working, so I wrapped all sparc64 IPI calls in irq_{enter,exit}() and pushed that to Linus.