From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764495AbYDYVNJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:13:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759929AbYDYVM5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:12:57 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:57321 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759080AbYDYVM5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:12:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:12:50 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Daniel Walker Cc: Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: Announce: Semaphore-Removal tree Message-ID: <20080425211250.GA13858@infradead.org> References: <20080425170021.GH14990@parisc-linux.org> <1209155917.12461.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1209155917.12461.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 01:38:37PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > I was reviewing your patches, and I don't like the semaphore to spinlock > changes.. There's no reason to start adding spinlocks, unless it's > really performance sensitive which none of those places are.. Yes, there is. The spinlock is our most efficient locking primitive for the normal mostly un-contentded case. Please get out of your realtime-ghetto.