From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760871AbYDZSfj (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:35:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757643AbYDZSfc (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:35:32 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:33930 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756096AbYDZSfb (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:35:31 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:34:34 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Michael Abbott Cc: Ben Dooks , Daniel Mack , linux-arm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Colibri: Fix support for DM9000 ethernet device. Message-Id: <20080426113434.2ca4c5b0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080424122203.B52164@saturn.araneidae.co.uk> References: <20080424095917.Q51356@saturn.araneidae.co.uk> <20080424112858.GD16284@fluff.org.uk> <20080424122203.B52164@saturn.araneidae.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:24:43 +0000 (GMT) Michael Abbott wrote: > On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Ben Dooks wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:13:09AM +0000, Michael Abbott wrote: > >> From: Michael Abbott > >> > >> Colibri: Fix support for DM9000 ethernet device. > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/colibri.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/colibri.c > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/colibri.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/colibri.c > >> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static void __init colibri_init(void) > >> /* DM9000 LAN */ > >> pxa_gpio_mode(GPIO78_nCS_2_MD); > >> pxa_gpio_mode(GPIO_DM9000 | GPIO_IN); > >> - set_irq_type(COLIBRI_ETH_IRQ, IRQT_FALLING); > >> + set_irq_type(COLIBRI_ETH_IRQ, IRQT_RISING); > > > > The set_irq_type() call here should be removed. > > I can confirm that Ben is right, and that the set_irq_type call can be > removed. > > What is the procedure here? Do I submit a new patch to supersede the old > one? Yup, that's OK.