From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758570AbYDZP7t (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:59:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754057AbYDZP7l (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:59:41 -0400 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:49708 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753941AbYDZP7k (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:59:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:59:39 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Announce: Semaphore-Removal tree Message-ID: <20080426155939.GQ14990@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080425170021.GH14990@parisc-linux.org> <20080426235439.52031d35.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080426235439.52031d35.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:54:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Willy, > > On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:00:21 -0600 Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > Stephen, could you pick these patches up for linux-next? > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/willy/misc.git semaphore-removal > > This is in addition to the semaphore branch? Should it go before or after > that i.e. does it depend on it? It's in addition to, and it's independent of it. I don't intend to create any conflicts or dependencies between them. In case I do ... let's say semaphore-removal goes after semaphore. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."