From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: missing locking in sched_domains code
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:24:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080428072456.GA26944@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080428070946.GA4507@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
* Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> /*
> + * Protects against concurrent calls to detach_destroy_domains
> + * and arch_init_sched_domains.
> + */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(sched_domains_mutex);
> +
> +/*
> * Partition sched domains as specified by the 'ndoms_new'
> * cpumasks in the array doms_new[] of cpumasks. This compares
> * doms_new[] to the current sched domain partitioning, doms_cur[].
> @@ -7756,7 +7762,8 @@ void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_n
> int i, j;
>
> lock_doms_cur();
> -
> + mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
i might be missing something but why not make doms_cur_mutex locking
unconditional and extend it to detach_destroy_domains() as well?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-27 21:12 Heiko Carstens
2008-04-28 1:39 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-28 7:09 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-04-28 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-04-28 7:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-28 7:52 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-04-28 8:11 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-04-28 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 8:49 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-04-28 8:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-28 9:17 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-04-28 9:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-28 9:33 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-04-28 12:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080428072456.GA26944@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome