From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937178AbYD1T7U (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:59:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765616AbYD1T7L (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:59:11 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.29]:45150 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765387AbYD1T7J (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:59:09 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=RZWGp1rgu3gFNzcNQ9CGpz0Gip5nwhc+IU67ZT++7mLJvGAuYpdAkRw1e4M+UgtGyOuh7amk7lFjxfgAun79CV1qivPl2yomBPoGAohThQihMvFupQ/kU5z11kl6OTlU+ap53XUM8xgS98sDZl7kTqRo06ImkZMdWrTfi8LmeTI= Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:58:56 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Stas Sergeev Cc: Andrew Morton , Takashi Iwai , Linux kernel , Vojtech Pavlik , Michael Opdenacker , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies Message-ID: <20080428155811.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> References: <4813476A.7000705@aknet.ru> <200804261918.14711.dtor-oss@comcast.net> <4813BD39.1080105@aknet.ru> <20080427042331.GB29127@anvil.corenet.prv> <481626B6.5040207@aknet.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <481626B6.5040207@aknet.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:34:14PM +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote: > Hello. > > Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > It looks like the change was introduced by commit > > 67926892ef7a7fbc76de607120d44416019fdf07 > Indeed. But the log message > http://www.mail-archive.com/git-commits-head@vger.kernel.org/msg36026.html > doesn't seem to specify the reason > for the change, so this doesn't > clarify a thing, unfortunately. > > > I think that we should register devices even if there is no driver in > > the kernel for it because driver may be compiled at later time or be out > > of tree. Adding patch author and other people that signed off the patch > > to CC... > Since there seem to be no objections, > would you mind adding the patch to your > git tree? Or who should that be? I try to stay within drivers/input boundaries ;) Ingo I think is the person you need. -- Dmitry