Re: x86: fix a couple of sparse warnings

[Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>]

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:56:08PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:01:56PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:43:25PM +0400, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
> > > > 2008/4/28 Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > >  /me wonders what was wrong with http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/23/131
> > > > >     that contains a superset of the first patch
> > > > >     (and got no response at all)
> > > > 
> > > > Adrian, I am sorry for duplicating your work. The clash wasn't 
> > > > intentional: I did not notice your earlier patch in the high traffic 
> > > > of this mailing list.
> > > 
> > > No problem, and I'm actually more interested why my patch got lost.
> > 
> > It's simple: in this case i had two patches in my backlog, one from a 
> > new person and one from a frequent contributor - doing the very same 
> > change. I preferred the newbie's patch, to encourage Dmitri to keep 
> > contributing to Linux and to help him learn from the experience of 
> > working with various Linux maintainers.
> >...
> 
> Every maintainer except you will teach the newbie where to find the 
> current tree to avoid duplicating work...
I have seen Ingo referring to his README file countless number of
times which describes where to locate the x86.git tree and
how to pull it. So has you.

	Sam