From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755102AbYD2Dv3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:51:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752874AbYD2DvR (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:51:17 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:47935 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752723AbYD2DvQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:51:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:51:08 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: NeilBrown Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH 007 of 9] md: prevent duplicates in bind_rdev_to_array Message-Id: <20080428205108.874eb9e3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1080429033527.20385@suse.de> References: <20080429133104.20146.patches@notabene> <1080429033527.20385@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:35:27 +1000 NeilBrown wrote: > > From: Dan Williams > > Found when trying to reassemble an active externally managed array. > Without this check we hit the more noisy "sysfs duplicate" warning in > the later call to kobject_add. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown > > ### Diffstat output > ./drivers/md/md.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff .prev/drivers/md/md.c ./drivers/md/md.c > --- .prev/drivers/md/md.c 2008-04-29 12:27:57.000000000 +1000 > +++ ./drivers/md/md.c 2008-04-29 12:27:57.000000000 +1000 > @@ -1369,6 +1369,11 @@ static int bind_rdev_to_array(mdk_rdev_t > MD_BUG(); > return -EINVAL; > } > + > + /* prevent duplicates */ > + if (find_rdev(mddev, rdev->bdev->bd_dev)) > + return -EEXIST; > + > /* make sure rdev->size exceeds mddev->size */ > if (rdev->size && (mddev->size == 0 || rdev->size < mddev->size)) { > if (mddev->pers) { Smells racy. Do we have enough locking in place here to make this more than a best-effort thing?