mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, harvey.harrison@gmail.com,
	mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops: remove "optimizations"
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:34:12 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080429.053412.15412725.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080429.030332.88897602.davem@davemloft.net>

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:03:32 -0700 (PDT)

> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:01:02 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> 
> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Ironically, I just bisected sparc64 bootup failures to the following
changeset.  It's very late here, and I haven't looked into the
details, but it seems to wedge in free_area_init_nodes() on a non-NUMA
system with CONFIG_NUMA disabled.

Isn't it funny that this optimization not only was useless, but also
broke things. :-/

64970b68d2b3ed32b964b0b30b1b98518fde388e is first bad commit
commit 64970b68d2b3ed32b964b0b30b1b98518fde388e
Author: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 11 16:17:19 2008 +0100

    x86, generic: optimize find_next_(zero_)bit for small constant-size bitmaps
    
    This moves an optimization for searching constant-sized small
    bitmaps form x86_64-specific to generic code.
    
    On an i386 defconfig (the x86#testing one), the size of vmlinux hardly
    changes with this applied. I have observed only four places where this
    optimization avoids a call into find_next_bit:
    
    In the functions return_unused_surplus_pages, alloc_fresh_huge_page,
    and adjust_pool_surplus, this patch avoids a call for a 1-bit bitmap.
    In __next_cpu a call is avoided for a 32-bit bitmap. That's it.
    
    On x86_64, 52 locations are optimized with a minimal increase in
    code size:
    
    Current #testing defconfig:
        146 x bsf, 27 x find_next_*bit
       text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
       5392637  846592  724424 6963653  6a41c5 vmlinux
    
    After removing the x86_64 specific optimization for find_next_*bit:
        94 x bsf, 79 x find_next_*bit
       text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
       5392358  846592  724424 6963374  6a40ae vmlinux
    
    After this patch (making the optimization generic):
        146 x bsf, 27 x find_next_*bit
       text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
       5392396  846592  724424 6963412  6a40d4 vmlinux
    
    [ tglx@linutronix.de: build fixes ]
    
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

:040000 040000 c0407f7df7dc5333c78c300780931a269ae0dedd 2f6ef634a35b6dd46e40ea70128c39a742e60501 M      include
:040000 040000 556ee6ccb15cdbb1aa5a690c732a5492d58dfe6f 937d05977f46056c12b5da64ca62959c06a912c0 M      lib

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-29 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-27 20:19 [PATCH] bitops: simplify generic bit finding functions Harvey Harrison
2008-04-27 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-27 20:29   ` Harvey Harrison
2008-04-27 20:36     ` Al Viro
2008-04-27 20:38       ` Harvey Harrison
2008-04-27 20:38     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-27 21:02       ` Al Viro
2008-04-28 14:04   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-28 15:10     ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-28 15:58       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-28 16:25     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-28 16:47       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-28 16:54         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-28 19:26           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-28 19:37             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-28 21:55               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-29 10:01               ` [PATCH] bitops: remove "optimizations" Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-29 10:03                 ` David Miller
2008-04-29 12:34                   ` David Miller [this message]
2008-04-29 14:20                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-29 22:31                       ` David Miller
2008-04-29 16:51                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-29 22:58                       ` David Miller
2008-04-29 23:30                         ` David Miller
2008-04-28 19:57           ` [PATCH] bitops: simplify generic bit finding functions Andi Kleen
2008-04-28 14:58   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-28 14:32 ` Alexander van Heukelum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080429.053412.15412725.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome