From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762673AbYD2VRw (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:17:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757712AbYD2VRm (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:17:42 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:35925 "HELO xenotime.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751886AbYD2VRl (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:17:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:17:36 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Russell King Cc: Adrian Bunk , "Denis V. Lunev" , Andrew Morton , linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, Alexey Dobriyan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pcmcia_ioctl.c compile error Message-Id: <20080429141736.dd483f2b.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <20080429211410.GD31311@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20080429182709.GB2898@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080429201704.GA31311@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20080429135902.504b6362.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20080429211410.GD31311@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:14:11 +0100 Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:59:02PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:17:04 +0100 Russell King wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:27:10PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > Commit 9c37066d888bf6e1b96ad12304971b3ddeabbad0 (proc: remove proc_bus) > > > > came through -mm that contains a patch implementing the overdue removal > > > > of the PCMCIA control ioctl that did not yet make it into Linus' tree: > > > > > > Okay, this means at least one of my platforms is now dead as far as > > > building new kernels for it, and nothing I can do about that. Ho hum. > > > > I don't get it. Several of us had building problems for a few > > days with some pasic driver. We posted some bug reports and > > some patches, but we put up with it for a few days... > > What don't you get? Why you said "building new kernels for it". So it confused me. It's not strictly a build issue, it's a run-time issue. > I've said each time the PCMCIA ioctl removal topic came up that it would > give me this precise problem. I've given details of _why_ it would cause > me that problem. It's gone ahead inspite of that. --- ~Randy