From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932156AbYD3SsW (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:48:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759587AbYD3SsN (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:48:13 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:44939 "HELO xenotime.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750884AbYD3SsM (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:48:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:48:08 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mporter@kernel.crashing.org, Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docbook: fix fatal rapidio yet again (and more to come) Message-Id: <20080430114808.64e2f40b.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <20080430113500.dfe21880.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080430113500.dfe21880.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:35:00 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:10:55 -0700 (PDT) > "Randy.Dunlap" wrote: > > > From: Randy Dunlap > > > > Don't refer to file that no longer exists: > > docproc: linux-2.6.25-git14/arch/powerpc/kernel/rio.c: No such file or directory > > > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap > > --- > > Documentation/DocBook/rapidio.tmpl | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > --- linux-2.6.25-git14.orig/Documentation/DocBook/rapidio.tmpl > > +++ linux-2.6.25-git14/Documentation/DocBook/rapidio.tmpl > > @@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ > > !Idrivers/rapidio/rio-sysfs.c > > > > PPC32 support > > -!Iarch/powerpc/kernel/rio.c > > !Earch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c > > !Iarch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c > > > > grumble. > > This is a subset of rapidio-fix-docbook-references.patch, but I appear to > be unable to interest anyone in merging/reviewing/accepting/anything-else > that quite large set of patches. > > Guys, those patches were sent six weeks ago and it now looks like they will > miss 2.6.26. This is pretty slack of us. Help? There's nothing there that can hurt. (famous last words) Just merge it. --- ~Randy