From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759870AbYD3OrR (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:47:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756692AbYD3OrA (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:47:00 -0400 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:38981 "EHLO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756465AbYD3Oq6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:46:58 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: IcS4kw5hlh5+WwOG3zGHFM3fVvFyZEJ5S/9RSIhopRkp 1209566817 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:46:55 -0300 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh To: Jean Delvare Cc: Matthew , Rudolf Marek , Maxim Levitsky , trenn@suse.de, Kasper Sandberg , Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Zhang, Rui" Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25 (coretemp reads high temperatures) Message-ID: <20080430144655.GB3543@khazad-dum.debian.net> References: <200804182151.49021.lenb@kernel.org> <200804231143.10875.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> <1209406784.11608.15.camel@localhost> <1209474423.1784.837.camel@queen.suse.de> <20080429170824.09540206@hyperion.delvare> <48179DB4.8040701@assembler.cz> <20080430081035.2e789a50@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080430081035.2e789a50@hyperion.delvare> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:58:50 +0200, Matthew wrote: > > so we were just too concerned all the time & even though the > > temperatures seem too high there's nothing to worry ? > > Yes. So the big deal here is that there is no "°C" anywhere in this measurement, it is in an arbitrary hardware scale? > > but like lm_sensors's output states - it's not bad until I / we're > > getting temperatures from 85°C (?) [in this particular case], ... > > If I remember correctly, at 84°C your CPU will start to throttle, at > 100°C it will shut down. You still have 24°C before the former happens, > so it should be OK. Better drop the °C from there. It starts throttling at 84 ITUs and shuts down at 100 ITUs (Intel Thermal Units :p). -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh