mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
To: mkrufky@linuxtv.org
Cc: bunk@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] dvb: build failure fix
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:52:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080430165214.10b793b4@gaivota> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4818C91E.8070307@linuxtv.org>

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:31:42 -0400
mkrufky@linuxtv.org wrote:

> > Are there actually reports from users running into this problem?

No.

Yet, the configuration may be valid. If you have a board with tda8290, it
_will_ need another chip, like tda827x.

In the past, both tda8290 and tda827x were handled by the same driver, and
worked for analog only.

So, IMO, this is a regression.

> >> Maybe, we
> >> may just do:
> >> obj-y += /dvb
> >> ...
> >>       
> >
> > Do DVB_TDA827X/DVB_TDA18271 need anything from DVB_CORE?
> >
> > If yes you'd only transform one build error into another.  
> 
> DVB_TDA827X and DVB_TDA18271 do not need anything from DVB_CORE -- their 
> only dependency is I2C_CORE.
> 
> I think Mauro renamed those Kconfig symbols to MEDIA_TUNER_TDAfoo now, btw.

I can't foresee any issues with those drivers. The risk I can see is to compile
some dvb core things that aren't needed, or whose Kconfig dependencies may be
incomplete.

I didn't make yet a deeper analysis to be sure that this won't cause any issues,
but I suspect that this would be safe.

I agree that we need to check the resulting dependencies.

Cheers,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-30 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-28 16:24 Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 18:04 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-28 19:53   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 21:01     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-28 21:25       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-28 21:29         ` mkrufky
2008-04-29 12:14           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-30 19:17           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-30 19:28             ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-30 19:31               ` mkrufky
2008-04-30 19:52                 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2008-04-30 20:01                   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-30 22:32                     ` mkrufky
2008-04-28 19:47 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-28 20:30   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 21:03     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-28 21:17       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 21:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 21:23           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 21:25             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080430165214.10b793b4@gaivota \
    --to=mchehab@infradead.org \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mkrufky@linuxtv.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome