mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.26-rc0
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:00:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804302100.26294.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080430114348.9ffd8dfc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Wednesday, 30 of April 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:20:11 -0400
> Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Linus,
> > 
> > please pull from: 
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release
> > 
> > This batch is a proper super-set of the pull request I made a week ago.
> > It will update the files shown below.
> > 
> 
> 
> I have four acpi-related reports here from 2.6.25-rcX-mmY.  Can you please check
> that they were addressed?  I don't recall seeing any feedback for any of
> them.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@gmail.com>
> To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, len.brown@intel.com
> Subject: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 -- initcall acpi_init+0x0/0x216() returned with preemption imbalance
> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:41:17 -0400
> 
> Is this indicative of a kernel or hardware problem?
> 
> [    0.279606] ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing
> [    0.279789] initcall acpi_init+0x0/0x216() returned with preemption imbalance
> [    0.330789] ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
> To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:14:55 +0800
> 
> Hi, I got the following lockdep warning:
> (add linux-acpi to cc)
> 
> [    0.097109] ACPI: Core revision 20070126
> [    0.097282] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> [    0.097355] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
> [    0.097428] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> [    0.097503] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 #3
> [    0.097578]  [<c0127bf8>] ? printk+0x18/0x20
> [    0.097716]  [<c014b01c>] __lock_acquire+0x40c/0x760
> [    0.097822]  [<c0181ba0>] ? alloc_debug_processing+0xb0/0x140
> [    0.097959]  [<c014b969>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
> [    0.098063]  [<c0140204>] ? down_trylock+0x14/0x40
> [    0.098197]  [<c03df9e8>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0xa0
> [    0.098303]  [<c0140204>] ? down_trylock+0x14/0x40
> [    0.098436]  [<c0140204>] down_trylock+0x14/0x40
> [    0.098540]  [<c027c7ea>] acpi_os_wait_semaphore+0x3e/0xb9
> [    0.098647]  [<c029263e>] acpi_ut_acquire_mutex+0x34/0x72
> [    0.098753]  [<c0289ab1>] acpi_ns_root_initialize+0x19/0x250
> [    0.098859]  [<c05453e6>] acpi_initialize_subsystem+0x42/0x64
> [    0.098966]  [<c0545725>] acpi_early_init+0x50/0xef
> [    0.099070]  [<c052b7f6>] start_kernel+0x1e6/0x250
> [    0.099175]  [<c052b1a0>] ? unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x130
> [    0.099310]  [<c052b008>] __init_begin+0x8/0x10
> [    0.099414]  =======================
> 
> 
> 
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com
> Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 (build failure)
> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:32:25 -0800
> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng.
> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
> 
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > 
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
> 
> When SMP=n, x86_64 build gets:
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `acpi_save_state_mem':
> (.text+0xfd7f): undefined reference to `setup_trampoline'
> make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1

This code has already been merged via the x86 tree, with the problem fixed
IIRC (at least it hasn't been reported against the mainline so far).

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-30 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-30 18:20 Len Brown
2008-04-30 18:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-30 19:00   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-04-30 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-01  0:26   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-05-01 12:16     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-01  6:39   ` Len Brown
2008-04-30 20:56 ` [patch] acpi: acpi_numa_init() build fix Ingo Molnar
2008-04-30 21:00   ` [patch] acpi: fix drivers/acpi/glue.c build error Ingo Molnar
2008-04-30 22:17     ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200804302100.26294.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®