From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764790AbYEATRq (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2008 15:17:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761194AbYEATRg (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2008 15:17:36 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:64784 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759077AbYEATRf (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2008 15:17:35 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: John Williams Subject: Re: microblaze syscall list Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 21:17:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: monstr@seznam.cz, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, Matthew Wilcox , Will Newton , Linux Kernel list , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, git@xilinx.com, John Williams , Stephen Neuendorffer , John Linn References: <87a5b0800804220513t75690ceao938a288596b5ad0c@mail.gmail.com> <48151726.9000204@itee.uq.edu.au> <200804281431.26570.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <200804281431.26570.arnd@arndb.de> X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]>=?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805012117.12991.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/b/6udfAdnWZebi4NYLL6mXClKvSn9qhYBgg1 0rTJOT3al5t0MgFIWHCTmOPS5r3uUnnekR2K8uCfLxMA12rZkN H7g3UjJYGRWwk8NwaUpow== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 28 April 2008, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > How about this strategy then: > * Change all the data types and syscall numbers in the -for-2.6.27 > branch to only include the minimal set, and a modern ABI > * Add the old interfaces as an out-of-tree patch that adds source > level compatibility with the old libc, but does not modify any > of the new interfaces, so that a patched kernel can run all binaries > built for the upstream version. > * phase out the old source interface gradually, as all users update > their libc source code. Any news on this from the microblaze people? Have you made up your mind on what route you want to go? Arnd <><