From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761155AbYEBIMF (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 04:12:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752592AbYEBILs (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 04:11:48 -0400 Received: from smtp4.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.38]:53524 "EHLO smtp4.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752460AbYEBILr (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 04:11:47 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 11:10:56 +0300 From: Adrian Bunk To: Andrew Morton Cc: Tom Rini , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, vegard.nossum@gmail.com Subject: Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem Message-ID: <20080502081056.GA2003@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> References: <20080430013108.GA18207@linux-os.sc.intel.com> <20080429.212833.192304794.davem@davemloft.net> <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEF7D18E@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com> <20080501215633.GU29330@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080501152051.4eb4bad3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080501153349.f4537ec7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080501232447.GF4354@smtp.west.cox.net> <20080501165945.077d34f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080501165945.077d34f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 04:59:45PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2008 16:24:47 -0700 > Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 03:33:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > Drat. There go my alpha, i386, m68k, s390, sparc and powerpc > > > cross-compilers. Vagard, save me! > > > > > > Meanwhile I guess I can locally unpatch that patch. > > > > I know I'll come off as an ass, but you can't make new ones with 4.1.2? > > It's not like we're talking about gcc 2.95/96 fun here :) > > Honestly, I nearly died when I built all those cross-compilers. Sooooooo > many combinations of gcc/binutils/glibc refused to work for obscure > reasons. Compilation on x86_64 just didn't work at all and I ended up > having to build everything on a slow i386 box, etc, etc. The stream of > email to Dan got increasingly strident ;) >... I have my binutils 2.18.50.0.6 / gcc 4.3 based cross toolchains for an i386 host here (no glibc included since I'm using them only for kernel testcompiles). If you are using an x86 machine I can rebuild them without -march=k8 and give you a copy. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed